Finasteride monotherapy maintains stable lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia following cessation of alpha blockers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our Canadian multicentre open-label study sought to evaluate, in patients with moderate/severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, the effect on symptoms of 9 months of monotherapy with finasteride 5 mg following 9 months of combination treatment (finasteride with an alpha-blocker) as quantified according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). METHODS: The primary outcome measure for efficacy was the maintenance of IPSS response after cessation of the alpha-blocker. Subjects were treated with a combination of finasteride and an alpha-blocker for 9 months and then with finasteride alone for 3 or 9 months. RESULTS: Results showed that the IPSS scores after 3 months of monotherapy were within the criteria for equivalence to those after 9 months of combination therapy. Symptom control equivalence was also found after 9 months of monotherapy. The IPSS response rate was also similar for combination and monotherapy. The safety profile was similar and as expected with these medications. CONCLUSION: Control of LUTS associated with BPH thus appears to be maintained for at least 9 months with finasteride alone, following a 9-month course of combination therapy with finasteride and an alpha-blocker, with similar safety profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".