Evidence of functional gender polymorphisms in a population of the hermaphroditic lowbush blueberry (<i>Vaccinium angustifolium</i>)<sup>1</sup>This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “A tribute to Sam Vander Kloet FLS: Pure and applied research from blueberries to heathland ecology”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lowbush blueberry ( Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) is a wild, but cultivated for profit, agricultural system grown primarily in the northeastern regions of North America. It has been suggested that a functional gender specialization may be occurring in this hermaphroditic species in which some individuals (termed clones) effectively function as bearers (high ovule production but little or nonviable pollen) or as pollen donors (low ovule number with high quantities of viable pollen). The purpose of this study was to investigate if functional gender specialization was occurring in a randomly chosen population of 56 clones from the Blueberry Hill Research Farm in Jonesboro, Maine. For each clone, the mean number of ovules and the mean number of viable microspores per flower were determined. From this, functional gender was calculated. Five out of 56 clones, or approximately 10% of clones, were found to be functioning primarily as females, owing to their low levels of viable pollen. Thus, some evidence was found of a functional gender specialization occurring—the presence of a few plants that were nearly male-sterile. Since the most common evolutionary pathway to gynodioecy involves the invasion of male steriles, it is interesting to speculate that a trend towards gender dimorphism could be occurring in lowbush blueberry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".