MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1683373684 · doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1336-0

Insulin and IGF-1, but not 17β-estradiol, alter the subcellular localization of MIER1α in MCF7 breast carcinoma cells

2015· article· en· W1683373684 on OpenAlexafffund
Shengnan Li, Gary D. Paterno, Laura L. Gillespie

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Research Notes · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNuclear localization sequenceSubcellular localizationBreast carcinomaCytoplasmCancer researchEstrogen receptorCell nucleusBreast cancerNucleusNuclear transportInsulinEstrogenRegulatorBiologyCarcinomaInternal medicineEndocrinologyCell biologyMedicineCancerBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: MIER1α is a transcriptional regulator that interacts with estrogen receptor α and inhibits estrogen-stimulated growth of breast carcinoma cells. Interestingly, analysis of MIER1α subcellular localization in breast samples revealed a stepwise shift from the nucleus to the cytoplasm during progression to invasive carcinoma. Previously, we demonstrated that MIER1α is nuclear in MCF7 cells yet it does not contain a nuclear localization signal. Instead MIER1α is targeted to the nucleus through interaction and co-transport with HDAC 1 and 2. RESULTS: In this study, we demonstrate that treatment of MCF7 breast carcinoma cells with either insulin or insulin-like growth factor affects the subcellular localization of MIER1α. Both factors reduce the percentage of cells with nuclear MIER1α from 81 and 89 to 41 and 56%, respectively. Treatment with 17β-estradiol, on the other hand, had no effect and MIER1α remained nuclear. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that insulin and IGF-1 can contribute to loss of nuclear MIER1α in the MCF7 breast carcinoma cell line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Research NotesSame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207