MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1685193781 · doi:10.14288/1.0078777

Reactive processing of ceramic binding systems for refractory castables

2009· article· en· W1685193781 on OpenAlexaff
Guotian Ye

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)CeramicMaterials scienceMetallurgyForensic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The general applied objective of this project is to develop hydratable alumina-bonded castables of properties comparable to the high-temperature fired basic bricks. This work is focused on improving the sintering of the ceramic binding systems at relatively low temperatures (~1300°C) through incorporation of ultrafine powders. Ultrafine magnesium aluminate spinel powders were synthesized using already known and original methods. Combustible ingredients were incorporated to prevent the direct contacts of the precursor particles during drying and the combustibles leave a continuous pore network, when they burn off during calcination at 700-800°C. Mechanical activation of the spinel precursor prepared using a heterogeneous sol-gel process decreased the activation energy for spinel formation from 688 kJ/mol to 468 kJ/mol, and lowered the incipient temperature of spinel formation from 900°C to 800°C, and the temperature of complete spinellization from >1280°C to 900°C. A new method for preparing homogeneous spinel precursor was presented and completely crystallized spinel with specific surface area of 105 m² /g, and crystallite size of 13 nm was formed from the precursor after calcination at 900°C. This work established the influence of ultrafine-sized powders on the sintering and strength development of multi-sized systems rich in large particles at relatively low temperatures, with emphasis on the temperatures around 1280°C. It was found that the relationship between the strength and linear shrinkage for the powder compacts consisting of uniform particle size distribution does not apply to the binding systems with wide particle size distributions (90 nm - 90 μm). The addition of the ultrafine powders (≤0.5 μm median) up to 10% had no significant influence on strength in two-component binding systems after firing at 1280°C and 1450°C. However, the ultrafine powders increased the strength of three-component binding systems presumably because the addition of ultrafine powders increased effective contacts for sintering. The particle size of the ultrafine power plays an important role in enhancing the strength of the castables after heat treatment at 816°C and 1280°C. Aggregate types have substantial influence on the strength of the castables after firing at 1280°C, eventually due to the cracks generated by in-situ spinel formation and mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients between the aggregate and the matrix. Spinel-based castables with high bending strength (>15 MPa) were obtained with addition of 2% ultrafine spinel (0.2 μm median) after firing at 1280°C. This research work also contributes to the reaction mechanisms of hydratable alumina with various forms of MgO. After hydration at 20°C for 48 h, a hydrotalcite hydrate was formed in the mixture of hydratable alumina and reactive magnesia, while such a hydrate was not observed in the mixtures of hydratable alumina and deadburnt or fused magnesite under the same hydration conditions. After hydration at room temperature for 48 h at 20°C and then for 12 h at 110°C, hydrotalcite compounds were formed in all three mixtures. The presence of deadburnt/fused magnesia in hydratable alumina-bonded castables improved the strength of the castables after drying at 110°C because of the hydrogen bonding of hydrotalcite and Mg(OH)₂ on magnesia particles. The polycondensation accompanying dehydroxylation of hydrotalcite and Mg(OH)₂ up to 816°C contributed to the higher strength of hydratable alumina-bonded castables containing magnesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207