MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1686543328 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab78

78 CHRONOLOGICAL EVENTS OF IN VITRO MATURATION IN CAMEL (CAMELUSDROMEDARIES) OOCYTES

2004· article· en· W1686543328 on OpenAlexafffund
N. A. Wani, U. Wernery, M.A. Nowshari

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsGerminal vesicleSodium pyruvateAndrologyIn vitro maturationOocyteOogenesisStainingOrceinBiologyReproductive biologyChemistryEmbryogenesisMedicineBiochemistryEmbryoCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were conducted to investigate the chronological events and optimum time for in vitro oocyte maturation in the dromedary camel. Follicles measuring 3–12 mm were isolated from ovaries obtained from an abattoir and the oocytes harvested by teasing apart these follicles under a stereo microscope. Pooled oocytes were randomly distributed to 4-well dishes (20–25 per well) (Nunc, Denmark) containing 400 µL of the maturation medium (TCM-199 supplemented with 0.6 mg mL-1 calcium lactate, 0.1 mg mL-1 L-glutamine, 0.8 mg mL-1 sodium bicarbonate, 1.4 mg mL-1 HEPES, 0.25 mg mL-1 pyruvate, 50 µg mL-1 gentamicine, 10 µg mL-1 FSH, 10 µg mL-1 LH, 1 µg mL-1 estradiol and 10% heat-inactivated estrous camel serum) and incubated at 38.5°C under 5% CO2 for 4 to 48 h. After every 4 h (starting from 0 to 48 h), oocytes were denuded by treating them with hyaluronidase (1 mg mL-1) followed by repeated pipetting. Denuded oocytes were mounted on glass slides and fixed in 3 : 1 ethanol : acetic acid for 24 h. Oocytes were stained with 1% aceto-orcein and examined under a phase contrast microscope at 400times. for each experimental group, 3 to 7 replications were made. Based on the visualization of the chromatin, oocytes were categorized as at germinal vesicle (GV), diakinesis (DK), metaphase-I (M-I), anaphase (Ana), metaphase-II (M-II) stage and those with no visible chromatin as NVC. At the start of maturation, 75.4% (43/57) of oocytes were at GV stage; however, none of the oocytes revealed a GV at 28 h of maturation (0/97). At 8 h of maturation 49.3% (34/69) of oocytes were at DK stage, and after 16 h of maturation 50% (49/98) of oocytes were at M-I stage. At 24 h of maturation the maximum number of oocytes were in Ana (24.7%, 21/85) stage. At 44 h the maximum number of oocytes had reached M-II stage (52%, 103/198) whereas, 10.6% (21/198) of the oocytes were at Ana stage. After 48 h the proportion of oocytes with NCV increased to 52.9% (45/85) and the proportion of M-II stage oocytes decreased to 37.6% (32/85). It may be concluded that 40–44 h of in vitro maturation yields the highest proportion of matured (M-II stage) oocytes suitable for further use in assisted reproductive technologies in camel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207