Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is a continuation of the Montréal stellar evolutionary model development (Richard et al., 2001 and references therein) where the effects of atomic diffusion are taken into account for 28 elements (see Turcotte, these proceedings), along with an approximate treatment of turbulent transport (Richer et al., 2000). We used the CEFF equation of state and the Bahcall nuclear energy generation routine. The Rosseland opacity is computed at each time step, from the OPAL monochromatic opacities for 21 elements (to which we added locally computed spectrum tables for Li, Be, and B) for each mesh point in the model for the current local chemical composition. Convection and semi-convection are taken into account in every species’ diffusion velocity and in the determination of the thermal gradient (Richard et al., 2001). The models also take into account gravitational settling, thermal diffusion, radiative accelerations and turbulent transport. The radiative accelerations are from Richer et al. (1998). The turbulent transport is modeled as a diffusion process (Richer et al., 2000) with diffusion coefficient: D T = ω D (He) 0 (ρ/ρ 0 ) n where D (He) 0 is the Ηe atomic diffusion coefficient at density ρ 0 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".