MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Political Elites and the Challenge of Free and Fair Elections in the Nigerian Fourth Republic

2011· article· en· W1689421553 on OpenAlex
S. M. Omodia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Education and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContradictionPoliticsPolityDemocracyPolitical scienceHumanitiesPower (physics)The RepublicState (computer science)SociologyLawPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conducting free, fair and credible elections constitute a major challenge to democratic stability in emerging democracies. This paper with specific focus on the Nigerian state of the fourth republic discusses the impediments to free and fair elections from the perspective of elitist contradiction and manipulation for power acquisition. The paper accentuates that elitist practice as regard the means of power acquisition, the purpose and utilization of political power or the nature of politics as witnessed in the present political dispensation is antithetical to democratic process. The paper further discussed the negative impact of ethnicization which presently manifest inform of zoning, incumbency factor and class interest on political behavior in the Nigerian polity and thus recommends the involvement of the academia and the civil society in enhancing political education as well as the need for informed political participation on the part of the people which is acquired through experience in the exercise over a period of time. Key words: Democracy; Electoral process; Elitist contradiction; Political power; Political representation; Political skill Resume La realisation d'elections libres, justes et credibles constituent defi majeur pour la stabilite democratique dans les democraties emergentes. Ce document avec un accent particulier sur l'etat nigerian de la Quatrieme Republique discuter des obstacles aux elections libres et equitables du point de vue de la contradiction et la manipulation elitiste pour l'acquisition de puissance. Qui accentuent la pratique de ce papier elitiste que les moyens d'acquerir le pouvoir, le but et l'utilisation du pouvoir politique ou le genre de politique, comme en temoigne dans la dispensation actuelle politique antithetique a la democratie est un processus. Le Top du papier suite d’avoir discute de l'impact negatif de l'ethnicisation qui actuellement se manifester informer de facteur de titularisation de zonage, et l'interet de classe sur le comportement politique dans la politique nigeriane et Malthus recommande l'implication du monde universitaire et la societe civile pour renforcer l'education politique ainsi que les Besoin pour la participation politique eclaire sur la main du peuple qui est acquis par l'experience dans l'exercice sur une periode de temps. Mots cles: Democratie; Processus electoral; Contradiction elitiste; Pouvoir politique; Representation politique; Competences politiques

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it