MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Augmented reality image guidance during off-pump mitral valve replacement through the guiraudon universal cardiac introducer.

2010· article· en· W168962075 on OpenAlexaff
G Guiraudon, Douglas L. Jones, Daniel Bainbridge, Cristian A. Linte, Danielle F. Pace, John Moore, Christopher Wedlake, Pencilla Lang, Terry M. Peters

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAugmented realityImaging phantomComputer scienceClipper (electronics)Computer visionIntracardiac injectionArtificial intelligenceSoftware portabilityBiomedical engineeringSimulationMedicineRadiologySurgeryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: : We report our experience with ultrasound augmented reality (US-AR) guidance for mitral valve prosthesis (MVP) implantation in the pig using off-pump, closed, beating intracardiac access through the Guiraudon Universal Cardiac Introducer attached to the left atrial appendage. METHODS: : Before testing US-AR guidance, a feasibility pilot study on nine pigs was performed using US alone. US-AR guidance, tested on a heart phantom, was subsequently used in three pigs (∼65 kg) using a tracked transesophageal echocardiography probe, augmented with registration of a 3D computed tomography scan, and virtual representation of the MVP and clip-delivering tool (Clipper); three pigs were used to test feature-based registration. RESULTS: : Navigation of the MVP was facilitated by the 3D anatomic display. AR displayed the MVP and the Clipper within the Atamai Viewer, with excellent accuracy for tool placement. Positioning the Clipper was hampered by the design of the MVP holder and Clipper. These limitations were well displayed by AR, which provided guidance for improved design of tools. CONCLUSIONS: : US-AR provided informative image guidance. It documented the flaws of the current implantation technology. This information could not be obtained by any other method of evaluation. These evaluations provided guidance for designing an integrated tool: combining an unobtrusive valve holder that allows the MVP to function properly as soon as positioned, and an anchoring system, with clips that can be released one at a time, and retracted if necessary, for optimal results. The portability of Real-time US-AR may prove to be the ideal practical image guidance system for all closed intracardiac interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207