Bibliographic record
Abstract
The workshop, moderated by Achiel Peelman, centered on a paper presented by Michael Galvan, Ohlone, pastor of St. Monica Parish in Moraga, California, and director of the Office of Clergy Formation in the diocese of Oakland. As a general introduction to the workshop, the moderator first presented an overview of the sociocultural complexity of the Native reality in Canada. He insisted both on the contemporary spiritual revival of North America's Native peoples and on their ongoing struggle for cultural survival in a society still dominated by social attitudes and colonial policies that aim to assimilate them, leaving them dispossessed of their culture, their language, their children, their economy, and their power of self-determination. Quoting Canadian Judge Thomas Berger, he pointed to the heart of the matter when raising the question: Do we really believe and accept that Native cultures are viable in contemporary North American society? The moderator also presented some observations on the theological meaning of incul tura t ion in reference to the Native reality. Reflecting with John Webster Grant on the historical encounter between the Christian missionaries and the Natives, he recognized that most Indians had become Christian but that Christianity had not become Indian. This failure notwithstanding, Christ or the gospel is deeply incarnated in the Native consciousness. The moderator invited the participants to adopt a Christ-centered rather than a church-centered understanding of inculturation. 4 The gospel, proclaimed to the Natives, will continue to challenge Native cultures while interacting with them. Native cultures will continue to challenge our Western understanding of Christianity. This encounter (the mystery and the process of inculturation) will produce new fruits that extend far beyond our present dreams and expectations. Are we ready to welcome and to evaluate all the results of this encounter between the gospel (Christ) and Native cultures?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".