MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1691443015 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546662.007

The Stokes Phenomenon and Hyperasymptotics

2001· book-chapter· en· W1691443015 on OpenAlexaff
R. B. Paris, D. Kamiński

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesPhenomenonClass (philosophy)Classical mechanicsMathematicsBoundary (topology)PhysicsMathematical analysisTheoretical physicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Stokes phenomenon plays a central role in the asymptotic description of the special functions of analysis and in the important class of asymptotic phenomena in mathematical physics known as ‘discontinuities’. Such discontinuities, along with those of a different origin arising in boundary layer theory and shocks in gas dynamics, are not true discontinuities in the mathematical sense but are found to depend on the scale on which the phenomenon in question is considered. When viewed under an appropriate magnification these discontinuities appear as a smooth albeit rapid transition from one form of description to another. An interesting discussion of such asymptotic phenomena is given in Friedrichs (1955).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207