Childhood overweight and obesity management: A national perspective of primary health care providers' views, practices, perceived barriers and needs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity and overweight in children are an escalating problem in Canada and worldwide. Currently, little is known about the manner in which primary health care providers are responding to Canada's obesity epidemic. OBJECTIVE: To determine the views, practices, challenges/barriers, and needs of a national sample of family physicians (FPs) and community paediatricians (CPs) with respect to paediatric obesity identification and management. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 1200 FPs and 1200 CPs across Canada between 2005 and 2006. RESULTS: A total of 464 FPs and 396 CPs participated. The majority of practitioners viewed paediatric obesity as an 'important'/'very important' issue. Although the majority reported providing dietary (more than 85%) and exercise (98%) advice to their overweight/obese patients, practitioners' perceived success rate in treating paediatric obesity was limited (less than 22%). Approximately 30% of FPs and 60% of CPs (P<0.05) used the recommended method to identify paediatric obesity. At least 50% of practitioners indicated that too few government-funded dietitians, a lack of success in controlling paediatric patients' weight, time constraints and limited training were key barriers to their success. To support efforts to identify or manage paediatric obesity, practitioners identified the need for office tools, patient educational materials and system-level changes. DISCUSSION: Canadian primary health care providers are not adequately equipped to deal with the paediatric obesity epidemic. Effective assessment tools and treatment resources, dissemination of clinical practice guidelines, enhanced undergraduate medical education and postgraduate continuing medical education, and system-level changes are urgently needed to address this health problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".