Índice de calidad del agua de consumo humano en el sistema de abastecimiento de agua potable en el ámbito rural del centro poblado de Paria – Willcawain – Huaraz
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl objetivo de esta investigacion es determinar la calidad y el riesgo del agua de consumo humano en el sistema de abastecimiento en el ambito rural del Centro Poblado de Paria – Willcawain – Huaraz. El tipo de estudio es aplicado de nivel explicativo, prospectivo, transversal, no experimental. El area de estudio fue en el Centro Poblado de Paria – Willcawain, la muestra seleccionada fueron 35 grifos de hogares y 4 captaciones de fuentes naturales (puquiales). La obtencion de los parametros microbiologicos, parasitologicos; organolepticos, quimicos inorganicos y organicos se realizo siguiendo las normas Internacionales y Nacionales en el laboratorio de calidad ambiental de la Universidad Santiago Antunez de Mayolo – Huaraz, para, posteriormente, calcular y calificar el Indice de Calidad del Agua-ICA mediante los metodos de Brown, Dinius, Lander y Deninger, Tyson y House, Swamee y Tyagi, y el Indice del Consejo Canadiense (CCME – WQI), desarrollado en USA, Inglaterra, India y Canada, respectivamente. Se obtuvo los siguientes resultados tanto en los grifos, como en las captaciones; en los grifos: ICABrown = 75,31, ICADinius = 63,56, ICALawder mnp = 68,12, ICALawder anp = 79,46, ICATyson = 56,90, ICASwamee = 33,28, ICACCME = 65,07; y en las captaciones: ICABrown = 74,26, ICADinius = 62,41, ICALawder mnp = 67,27, ICALawder anp = 78,32, ICATyson = 55,39, ICASwamee = 35,65, ICACCME = 65,07. Se concluye que se evidencia un proceso gradual de deterioro de la calidad del agua debido a las actividades antropicas, por lo que se recomienda realizar tratamientos de agua para que sea apta para el consumo humano. EnglishThe objective of this research is determining the quality and the risk of drinking water in the supply system in rural areas’ the Town Centre Paria -Willcawain -Huaraz. The type of study is practical explanatory, prospective, transversal, no experimental level. The study area was in the Town Center Paria -Willcawain, the selected sample households were 35 taps and 4 abstractions from natural sources (spiral). The obtains microbiological parameters, parasitological; organoleptic, inorganics and organic chemicals was performed according to International and National standards on environmental quality laboratory at the Universidad Nacional “Santiago Antunez de Mayolo” -Huaraz, to after, calculate and rate the Water Quality Index (ICA) using methods Brown, Dinius, Lander and Deninger, Tyson and House, Swamee and Tyagi, and the Index´s the Canadian Council (CCME -WQI), developed in USA, England, India and Canada respectively. The following results were obtained both in the taps, and deposits; on taps: ICABrown = 75,31, ICADinius = 63,56, ICALawder mnp = 68,12, ICALawder anp = 79,46, ICATyson = 56,90, ICASwamee = 33,28, ICACCME = 65,07; y en las captaciones: ICABrown = 74,26, ICADinius = 62,41, ICALawder mnp = 67,27, ICALawder anp = 78,32, ICATyson = 55,39, ICASwamee = 35,65, ICACCME = 65,07. We conclude that a measured process of deterioration of water quality due to human activities, so it is recommended that water treatment to make it fit for human drinking is evident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it