MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gut microbiome in early pediatric multiple sclerosis: a case-control study (P4.027)

2015· article· en· W1697477849 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Tremlett, Douglas Fadrosh, Susan V. Lynch, Janace Hart, Jennifer Graves, Sabeen Lulu, Gregory Aaen, Anita Belman, Leslie Benson, Charlie Casper, Tanuja Chitnis, Mark Gorman, Lauren Krupp, Timothy Lotze, Jayne Ness, Shelly Roalstad, Moses Rodriguez, John Rose, Jan‐Mendelt Tillema, Bianca Weinstock‐Guttman, Emmanuelle Waubant

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuttman scaleGut microbiomeMedicineMultiple sclerosisMicrobiomePsychologyPsychiatryBioinformaticsBiologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:Alterations in the gut microbiome may be influential in neurological disease. We explored gut microbiome profiles in early pediatric MS and age and sex matched controls. DESIGN/METHODS:Children ≤18 years old attending a University of California, San Francisco pediatric clinic were invited to participate in a genetic and environmental risk factors study (NS071463,PI:Waubant). MS cases were within 2 years of onset. Controls were free from autoimmune disorders (asthma and eczema allowed). Stools were shipped on ice and stored at -80C. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from extracted DNA and bacterial profiles were generated using the PhyloChip G3 microarray (Second Genome, Inc., CA). Associations between the pediatric characteristics and variation in the bacterial community composition were assessed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling and permutational multivariate analysis of variance with distance matrices. RESULTS:Between Nov/2011-Nov/2013, 20 MS (10 girls, 10 boys) and 16 controls (9 girls, 7 boys) aged 13.2 years (mean; SD=3.84; range 4-18) provided stool samples. Within two months pre-stool collection, 3 children (2 cases, 1 control) were exposed to an antibiotic, 10 (8 cases, 2 controls) to a corticosteroid and 12 to an immuno-modulatory or -suppressant drug (10 cases, 2 controls). All cases met McDonald criteria, had relapsing-remitting MS and a short disease duration (mean=11 months; range 2-24 at stool collection). The median EDSS at enrolment was 2.0 (range 0-4.0). Preliminary microbiome results indicated significant differences in specific bacterial taxa between cases and controls, with enriched tax predominated by Proteobacteria (e.g. Shigella, Escherichia), p<0.001, false discovery rates, q<0.192. Depleted taxa displayed greater heterogeneity, and included Firmicutes (Eubacterium rectale) and Actinobacteria (Corynebacterium) but also higher false discovery rates (all q<0.372 and p<0.044). CONCLUSIONS:Specific taxa were significantly altered in relative abundance in very early onset pediatric MS, with enrichment for microbiota known to be associated with gastrointestinal infectious processes. Study Supported by:NIH(NS071463);NMSS(RG4861A3/1);PI:Waubant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207