P2Y<sub>2</sub> receptor expression is regulated by C/EBPβ during inflammation in intestinal epithelial cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases are characterized by relapses and remission periods during which numerous factors, including stress factors and nucleotides, are mobilized to re-establish intestinal mucosal homeostasis. We have previously found that expression of the P2Y(2) nucleotide receptor is increased in colonic tissue isolated from inflammatory bowel disease patients as well as in a mouse model of colitis, and that P2Y(2) transcription is regulated in part by nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) p65. Transcription factor DNA-binding site analysis identified three potential CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ) binding sites in the P2Y(2) proximal promoter. We then assessed the role of C/EBP transcription factors in the regulation of P2Y(2) in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). We identified a region between -229 and -220 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site as a DNA-binding site for C/EBPβ, by electrophoretic mobility and supershift assays. Mutagenesis of this site decreased C/EBPβ-dependent P2Y(2) expression, as assessed by luciferase assays. In vivo, C/EBPβ as well as P2Y(2) expression was increased in colonic IECs isolated from mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute colitis. In contrast, P2Y(2) expression was decreased in C/EBPβ-deficient mice treated with dextran sulfate sodium. Although C/EBPβ was sufficient to induce P2Y(2) transcription, the effect of C/EBPβ and NF-κB p65 on receptor transcription was synergistic. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that both proteins simultaneously bind to the P2Y(2) promoter. Thus, we have identified C/EBPβ as a novel regulator of P2Y(2) expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".