Side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in children with cerebral palsy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article reports the side effects observed in a double-blind placebo-controlled multi-center randomized clinical trial carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Intention-to-treat analysis did not prove to have a beneficial effect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 111 children aged 3 to 12 years were included and followed for 8 weeks. They all received 40 compressions of 1 hour (5 days per week). In the treated group (n=57), HBO2 sessions consisted of an exposure to 100% oxygen at 1.75 atmosphere absolute (atm abs) while children in the control group (n=54) received air at 1.3 atm abs. A physician carried out a general health surveillance including an ear examination prior to and immediately following each session. All clinical events occurring during the course of the study were recorded. FINDINGS: Events were classified in 3 categories: Events related to pressure/volume changes, events related to oxygen toxicity, and other events. No events due to oxygen toxicity were noted. Only middle ear barotrauma significantly differed according to the groups (50% in HBO2 session group versus 27.8% in control group). Other events were rare and equivalent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Short-term exposure to HBO2 at medium level pressure (1.75 atm abs) was responsible for a significant increase of middle ear barotrauma compared to children that received very low external pressure (1.3 atm abs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".