Stiff ordinary and delay differential equations in biological systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Santillan-Mackey model of the tryptophan operon was developed to characterize the anthranilate synthase activity in cultures of Escherichia coli. Similarly, the GABA reaction scheme was formulated to characterize the response of the GABAA receptor at a synapse, and the Hodgkin-Huxley model was developed to characterize the action potential of a squid giant axon. While the Hodgkin-Huxley model has been studied in great detail from a mathematical vantage, much less is known about the preceding two models in this regard. This work examines the stiffness of all three models; a novel perspective for both the Santillan-Mackey model and the GABA reaction. The characterization of the stiffness in these problems gives theoretical biologists insight into the dynamics of the reactions. It also enables them to select more computationally efficient methods for numerical simulations. The discovery of invariant manifolds in the Santillan-Mackey model and the GABA reaction in this work present experimentalists with concrete assays, against which the models can be tested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".