MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1700557162 · doi:10.4000/jso.7298

The replicas of rongorongo objects in the musée du quai Branly (Paris)

2015· article· fr· W1700557162 on OpenAlexaff
Rafał Wieczorek, Paul Horley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de la Société des océanistes · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
FundersSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsInscribed figureArtPlaster CastsReplicaVisual artsMedicineMathematicsOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a detailed analysis of 29 casts of inscribed tablets from Easter Island in the collections of musée du quai Branly. The major number of the casts covers the tablets from the Congregations of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary (Rome). Two sets of casts document Saint Petersburg tablets. The remaining casts represent two Washington tablets, two Vienna tablets, two Santiago tablets as well as two artefacts from the British Museum (London tablet and Small London reimiro), and a cast of now-lost Lateran tablet. We discuss in detail the casts that are unique for the collection – the replica of Large Vienna tablet that displays more glyphs than the present-day artefact, and the cast of Lateran tablet. It was also shown that the cast of Small Santiago tablet is not faithful to the original but rather made after artistic reproduction of the tablet based on the tracings published in 1875 by Philippi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de la Société des océanistesSame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207