Investigation Of The Rescue Of The Rubella Virus P150 Replicase Protein Q Domain By The Capsid Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rubella virus (RUB) capsid protein (C) is a multifunctional phosphoprotein with roles beyond encapsidation. It is able to rescue a large lethal deletion of the Q domain in the P150 replicase gene at a step in replication before detectable viral RNA synthesis, indicating a common function shared by RUB C and the Q domain. The goal of this dissertation was to use constructs containing the N-terminal 88 amino acids of RUB C, the region previously defined as the minimal region required for the rescue of Q domain mutants, to elucidate the function of RUB C in Q domain rescue and viral RNA synthesis. In the first specific aim, the rescue function of 1-88 RUB C and the importance of an arginine-rich cluster, R2, within 1-88 RUB C for rescue were confirmed. Rescue was not correlated with intracellular localization or phosphorylation status of RUB C. In the second specific aim, the involvement of RUB C in early events post-transfection with RUB RNA was analyzed. RUB C specifically protected RUB transcripts early post-transfection and protection required R2. However, it was concluded the protection observed was due to the encapsidation function of RUB C and not related to Q domain rescue. No differences in the translation of the RUB nonstructural proteins in the presence or absence of RUB C were observed. Interactions of RUB C with host cell proteins were analyzed. Although the interaction of RUB C with cellular p32 required the R2 cluster, both wild type (does not require RUB C for replication) and RQQ (requires RUB C for replication) Q domain bound p32, indicating interaction with this binding partner is not the basis of rescue. Using a human protein array phosphatidylinositol transfer protein alpha isoform (PITP?) was found to interact with RUB C but not its R2 mutant. However, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that this protein binds both forms of RUB C. Although the mechanism behind the rescue of the RUB P150 Q domain by RUB C remains unknown, we propose a model that RUB C plays a role in generation of the virus replication complex in infected cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".