MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W17030366 · doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2006.09.002

LINEAR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT MODELS AND FUND CHARACTERISTICS

2003· article· en· W17030366 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Ayadi, Lawrence Kryzanowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Calcium · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconometricsEconomicsPortfolioMutual fundEquity (law)Target date fundActuarial scienceFinancial economicsFinanceOpen-end fundInstitutional investor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microdomains of Ca(2+), which are formed at sites where Ca(2+) enters the cytoplasm either at the cell surface or at the internal stores, are a key element of Ca(2+) signalling. The term microdomain includes the elementary events that are the basic building blocks of Ca(2+) signals. As Ca(2+) enters the cytoplasm, it produces a local plume of Ca(2+) that has been given different names (sparks, puffs, sparklets and syntillas). These elementary events can combine to produce larger microdomains. The significance of these localized domains of Ca(2+) is that they can regulate specific cellular processes in different regions of the cell. Such microdomains are particularly evident in neurons where both pre- and postsynaptic events are controlled by highly localized pulses of Ca(2+). The ability of single neurons to process enormous amounts of information depends upon such miniaturization of the Ca(2+) signalling system. Control of cardiac cell contraction and gene transcription provides another example of how the parallel processing of Ca(2+) signalling can occur through microdomains of intracellular Ca(2+).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.094 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CalciumSame topicFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFrench-language works237,207