MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Revised Diagnostic Criteria for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (S63.001)

2014· article· en· W1703601342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromyelitis opticaSpectrum disorderMedicineBroad spectrumPsychoanalysisPsychologyPsychiatryMultiple sclerosisChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To revise diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorders. Background: NMO is an inflammatory demyelinating CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS) and associated with serum aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG). Current diagnostic criteria were developed in 2006 and require both optic nerve and spinal cord involvement. However, clinical and neuroimaging evidence, especially from AQP4-IgG seropositive patients, has revealed a wider disease spectrum. The International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) was convened to develop revised, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria. Design/Methods: The INPD met on 7 occasions between October, 2011 and November, 2013. Nineteen panel members participated in 6 working groups (clinical presentation, serology, neuroimaging, pediatrics, systemic autoimmunity, and opticospinal MS), each of which were charged with addressing focused questions to contribute to the revised diagnostic criteria. Each working group conducted systematic literature reviews related to their specific charges and summarized the results. Electronic surveys were then used to develop new criteria, which were iteratively refined through electronic scoring and face-to-face meetings. Results: The new diagnostic nomenclature defines the unified term “NMO spectrum disorders” (NMOSD), which is stratified by serological testing results (NMOSD with or without AQP4-IgG). Core characteristics of NMOSD with AQP4 antibodies include clinical syndromes and/or MRI findings related to optic nerve, spinal cord, brain stem, diencephalic, or cerebral presentations. The presence of enriched core characteristics, plus additional supportive criteria, are required for diagnosis of NMOSD without AQP4-IgG. The IPND also achieved consensus on pediatric NMOSD diagnosis, AQP4-IgG testing, monophasic NMOSD and opticospinal MS. Conclusions: The IPND achieved consensus on revised diagnostic criteria for adult and pediatric NMOSD, with or without AQP4-IgG, for clinical and research purposes and to distinguish NMOSD from competing diagnoses. These criteria require prospective validation. The proposed nomenclature allow for future revisions to account for new clinical, neuroimaging, laboratory, and antibody associations. Study Supported by: Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it