Québec-Wallonie. Dynamiques des espaces et expériences francophones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Wallonie et le Quebec, deux societes appartenant au monde industrialise mais evoluant dans des contextes continentaux fort differents, ont neanmoins en commun certaines caracteristiques : le catholicisme comme religion dominante, une vie politique marquee par le biculturalisme. Elles partagent egalement une situation de relative marginalite par rapport a des voisins de grande taille (France, Allemagne, Etats-Unis) et a l'aire linguistique francophone. Enfin, en partie en raison de ces traits communs, elles ont entretenu et entretiennent toujours des relations sur les plans social, culturel et economique. En quoi ces points communs ont-ils conduit a des evolutions convergentes? Dans quelle mesure les particularites nationales s'expliquent-elles par les contextes continentaux? Des collectivites nationales, modestes quant aux effectifs et occupant des places non-dominantes a l'echelle internationale, produisent-elles des pratiques sociales et des modeles culturels comparables? Autant de questions sous-jacentes aux echanges qui animent les chercheurs du Centre interuniversitaire d'etudes quebecoises (CIEQ) et du Departement d'histoire de l'Universite catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve) dont on retrouve une selection de contributions dans ce volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".