Job tenure and quality of work life of people with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychiatric disabilities may impact employment outcomes, particularly job tenure. However, little is known about the role of quality of work life (QWL) on an individual's ability to maintain his/her employment, particularly in the context of social enterprises. This study examines the impact of QWL on maintaining employment for people with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises. A prospective study was undertaken with 67 persons with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises. Participants were asked to fill out a battery of questionnaires that assessed QWL, self-esteem as a worker, job satisfaction, severity of symptoms, and general quality of life. Directors of human resources were contacted at six-month follow-up in order to obtain information regarding job tenure. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression to assess the risk of job termination and identify predictors. Eighty-nine percent (N = 60) of participants maintained their job during the follow-up period. Cox regression showed that individuals who have a higher QWL have a diminished risk of employment termination. This study demonstrated the important role that QWL may have on job tenure for people with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises. Interventions aimed at improving QWL should be offered to increase job tenure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".