MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1705667628

Malia revisited : a GIS-based functional analysis of the Pre-, Proto- and Neo-palatial Occupation

2012· dissertation· en· W1705667628 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Piraye Hacıgüzeller

Bibliographic record

VenueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyBronze AgeArchaeologyGeographic information systemQuarter (Canadian coin)Regional scienceCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principal aim of this study is to tailor a new position for geographical information systems (GIS) within the frame of intra-site spatial research in archaeology, and to enhance the uses of the technology in the discipline through theoretical and methodological innovation. The research seeks to fulfil this objective through four specific approaches: through a critical evaluation of the position of GIS technology in archaeology; through theoretical reconsideration of what archaeological GIS is and what we can do with GIS in archaeology; through GIS-related technical innovation; and, finally, by assembling these components and outlining two case studies from Malia, one of the largest Bronze Age settlements in north-central Crete (Greece). These two cases studies are respectively the Late Minoan IB occupation at Zeta Beta and Middle Minoan IIB occupation in Building A in the Mu Quarter. The focus in each of these two case studies is on cooking practices. The decision to think through a certain practice (i.e. cooking) while framing a discussion on materials and space, results from 'non-representational thinking'. After a general introduction (Chapter 1), the chapters feature a series of discussions that aim to reconceptualise GIS and its existing critique (Chapter 2), present two new techniques to use GIS at architectural level (i.e. metric and visual integration analysis) (Chapter 3) and bring all these GIS-related innovations together on case studies regarding cooking practices at Zeta Beta and Building A of the Mu Quarter (Chapters 4, 5 and 6). The conclusion of the research is not only that archaeological GIS can be fruitfully employed at architectural level to study everyday, routine practices. It is also concluded that Late Minoan IB occupation at building Zeta Beta and Middle Minoan IIB occupation at Building A embodied very different potentials at Bronze Age Malia when it came to everyday cooking practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Same topicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryFrench-language works237,207