Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an analysis of treatment outcome according to physeal stability.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip disorder in adolescents. Treatment can be associated with serious complications, mainly avascular necrosis (AVN). The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications based on physeal stability at presentation. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively all children treated for SCFE from 1990 through 2000 at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa. RESULTS: Of a total of 87 patients (56 male) identified, 73 had slips classed as stable and 14, unstable; 42 involved the left side, 34 the right, and 19 were bilateral. Avascular necrosis (AVN) developed in 1 patient with a stable slip (morbidity 1.4%) and in 3 with unstable slips (21.4%; p = 0.001). Manipulative anatomical reduction was done in 11 cases (78.5%), all unstable slips. All slips complicated by AVN had been classified according to the traditional system as acute-on-chronic. Complication rates differed significantly between unstable slips (36%) and stable (20%). No statistically significant association was found between AVN and slip severity, time to fixation or use of reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of stable slips exhibits a lower incidence of AVN. These results nevertheless suggest that gentle reduction of unstable slips is safe and unaccompanied by an increase in complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".