Alginate formation in Azotobacter vinelandii UWD during stationary phase and the turnover of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Azotobacter vinelandii UWD is a mutant of strain UW that is defective in the respiratory oxidation of NADH. This mutation causes an overproduction of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), as polyester synthesis is used as an alternative electron sink. Since PHAs have potential for use as natural, biodegradable plastics, studies of physiology related to their production are of interest. Alginate production by this strain is limited to < 11 microg (mg cell protein)(-1), which permits high efficiency conversion of carbon source into PHA. However, < or = 400 microg (mg cell protein)(-1) was formed when UWD cells were oxygen-limited and in the stationary phase of growth. Alginate formation was fuelled by PHA turnover, which was coincident with the synthesis of alkyl resorcinols, under conditions of exogenous glucose limitation. However, alginate production was a phenotypic and reversible change. Alginate production was stopped by interruption of algD with Tn5lacZ. LacZ activity in UWD was shown to increase in stationary phase, while LacZ activity in a similarly constructed mutant of strain UW did not. Transcription of algD in strain UWD started from a previously identified RpoD promoter and not from the AlgU (RpoE) promoter. This is because strain UWD has a natural insertion element in algU. Differences between strain UW and UWD may reside in the defective respiratory oxidation of NADH, where the NADH surplus in strain UWD may act as a signal of stationary phase. Indeed, a backcross of UW DNA into UWD generated NADH-oxidase-proficient cells that failed to form alginate in stationary phase. Evidence is also presented to show that the RpoD promoter may be recognized by the stationary phase sigma factor (RpoS), which may mediate alginate production in strain UWD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".