Sistemas de Autobuses Rápidos: un nuevo modo de transporte público metropolitano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los ultimos anos estan teniendo un desarrollo enorme los sistemas de transporte publico basados en corredores troncales de autobuses. Desde el ejemplo de Curitiba, seguido en varias ciudades de Latino America, y especialmente despues de TransMilenio en Bogota, las ciudades del mundo en vias de desarrollo han redescubierto al autobus. Pero tambien paises desarrollados llevan anos trabajando en la misma direccion, son los casos de Estados Unidos de America, Canada, Australia y Francia. En Madrid, la propuesta presentada por el Ministerio de Fomento en el mes de abril de 2005, unido a la politica que esta llevando el Consorcio Regional de Transportes de Madrid con la construccion de nuevos intercambiadores, va a permitir definir un nuevo sistema de transporte para la movilidad radial metropolitana. Sistema que debe ir acompanado de un paquete integrado de medidas que complementen las actuaciones de infraestructura. El articulo recoge una aproximacion a la evolucion que han tenido estos sistemas, resaltando la propuesta a desarrollar en Madrid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".