L’Esthétique de l’Existence Chez Quelques Personnages Romanesques de France et de Chine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThe literary creation in the countries like French and China is taken account into one part of the rich culture. It’s considered not only as one kind of the continuation of real life and of the involvement in the social evolution, but also as the discovery of the metaphysic signification of the reality and of the revolt face the injustice as well as the confinement of human destiny.In this paper, with some characters who lived in the integrity of human existence such as in L’assommoir, Les Miserables, Si Yeou Ki, Le Reve dans Le Pavillon Rouge, I will study the subjects about the care of self, the practical technique of existence, and metamorphosis from which the authors inspire us the authenticity of the art of life. This revalorization for the aesthetic existence paves the way for the cultural and humanity convergence between the two countries. Key words: Aesthetic; Existence; French; China; Literature ResumeLa creation litteraire dans les pays comme la France et la Chine est notamment prise en compte dans l’epanouissement culturel des apprenants des langues des deux pays. Elle est ainsi consideree non seulement comme une sorte de continuite de la vie vecue et de l’engagement dans l’evolution sociale, et egalement comme la decouverte de la signification metaphysique de la realite et de la revolte face a l’injustice et a l’enfermement du destin humain. Dans cette recherche, a travers quelques personnages romanesques qui temoignent de l’integrite de l’existence humaine comme dans L’assommoir, Les Miserables, Si Yeou Ki, Le Reve dans Le Pavillon Rouge, je traiterai de la problematique de l’existence comme le souci du soi et la metamorphose pour eprouver l’authenticite de l’art de vivre. Cette revalorisation de l’esthetique de l’existence ouvre un chemin vers la convergence culturelle et humaniste entre les deux pays. Mots Cles: Esthetique; Existence; France; Chine; Litterature
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".