MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1712935512 · doi:10.1111/ner.12208

The Appropriate Use of Neurostimulation of the Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nervous System for the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Ischemic Diseases: The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee

2014· article· en· W1712935512 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy R. Deer, Nagy Mekhail, David Provenzano, Jason E. Pope, Elliot S. Krames, Michael S. Leong, Robert M. Levy, David Abejón, Eric Buchser, G.A. Burton, Asokumar Buvanendran, Kenneth D. Candido, David Caraway, Michael J. Cousins, Michael J. L. DeJongste, Sudhir Diwan, Sam Eldabe, Kliment Gatzinsky, Robert D. Foreman, Salim M. Hayek, Philip Kim, Thomas M. Kinfe, David Kloth, Krishna Kumar, Syed Rizvi, Shivanand P. Lad, Liong Liem, Bengt Linderoth, Sean Mackey, Gladstone McDowell, Porter McRoberts, Lawrence Poree, Joshua P. Prager, Lou Raso, Richard Rauck, Marc Russo, Brian Simpson, Konstantin V. Slavin, Peter S. Staats, Michael Stanton‐Hicks, Paul Verrills, Joshua Wellington, Kayode Williams, Richard B. North

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRegina General HospitalUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurostimulationMedicineNeuromodulationNeuropathic painRandomized controlled trialChronic painAnesthesiaClinical trialIntensive care medicinePhysical therapySurgeryInternal medicineStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0100.003
Research integrity0.0120.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations586
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuromodulation Technology at the Neural InterfaceSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207