Structural analysis of the carbohydrate components of the outer membrane of the lipopolysaccharide‐lacking cellulolytic ruminal bacterium <i>Fibrobacter succinogenes</i> S85
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The polysaccharides from the outer membrane of the Gram-negative ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes were isolated by phenol/water extraction and separated by size-exclusion chromatography in the presence of deoxycholate detergent into a lower-molecular-mass fraction designated 'glycolipid' and a high-molecular-mass 'capsular polysaccharide' fraction. Both fractions lacked typical lipopolysaccharide components including 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid and 3-hydroxy fatty acids. Carbohydrate components of these fractions were represented by two polysaccharides and one oligosaccharide (possibly glycolipid) with the following structures: : : where HEAEP is N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethylphosphonic acid, found for the first time in natural compounds. The polysaccharides contained pentadecanoic acid and anteisopentadecanoic acid, possibly present as the acyl components. All constituent monosaccharides except L-rhamnose had a D-configuration. In addition to having a structural role in the outer membrane, these polysaccharides may provide protection for this lipopolysaccharide-less bacterium in the highly competitive ruminal environment, as phosphonic acids covalently linked to membrane polymers have in the past been attributed the function of stabilizing membranes in the presence of phosphatases and lipases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".