Is there an optimal age for recovery from motor cortex lesions? II. behavioural and anatomical consequences of unilateral motor cortex lesions in perinatal, infant, and adult rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the behavioural and anatomical effects of unilateral motor cortex ablation in neonatal, infant, and adult rats. METHODS: Rats were given unilateral lesions of the motor cortex on the day of birth (P1), at ten days of age (P10), or in adulthood. They were trained on several motor tasks (skilled forelimb reaching, beam traversing, tongue extension), general motor activity, and a test of spatial learning (Morris water task). RESULTS: Although all lesion groups were equally impaired at skilled reaching with the forelimb contralateral to the lesion, rats with P1 lesions also were impaired at traversing a narrow beam and at learning the Morris task. Gross anatomical analyses revealed that the P1 rats had smaller brains than the other groups, a result that may account for the larger behavioural deficits in the P1 group. Analysis of Golgi-Cox stained neurons showed that relative to control groups, all lesion groups showed an increase in dendritic length in the basilar dendrites of layer III pyramidal cells and, paradoxically a decrease in length of the apical dendrites of the same cells. CONCLUSIONS: The bilateral alterations in dendritic organization following the motor cortex lesions suggest that there has been a bilateral reor-ganization of intrinsic cortical connectivity following motor cortex lesions at any age. These alterations in connectivity are likely not identical in the young and adult animals, however, because relative to controls, both the young operated groups, but not the adult group, showed a bilat-eral drop in spine density in the basilar dendrites of layer V pyramidal cells. These findings are discussed with respect to the idea that there may be critical ages in development in which animals can use anatomical modifications to compensate for deficits produced by cortical injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it