MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1715509269 · doi:10.3233/rnn-2000-00141

Is there an optimal age for recovery from motor cortex lesions? II. behavioural and anatomical consequences of unilateral motor cortex lesions in perinatal, infant, and adult rats

2000· article· en· W1715509269 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan Kolb, Jan Cioe, Ian Q. Whishaw

Bibliographic record

VenueRestorative Neurology and Neuroscience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForelimbLesionMotor cortexCortex (anatomy)Motor learningCorpus callosumTongueMedicineMorris water navigation taskAnatomyNeurosciencePsychologyPathologyHippocampal formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the behavioural and anatomical effects of unilateral motor cortex ablation in neonatal, infant, and adult rats. METHODS: Rats were given unilateral lesions of the motor cortex on the day of birth (P1), at ten days of age (P10), or in adulthood. They were trained on several motor tasks (skilled forelimb reaching, beam traversing, tongue extension), general motor activity, and a test of spatial learning (Morris water task). RESULTS: Although all lesion groups were equally impaired at skilled reaching with the forelimb contralateral to the lesion, rats with P1 lesions also were impaired at traversing a narrow beam and at learning the Morris task. Gross anatomical analyses revealed that the P1 rats had smaller brains than the other groups, a result that may account for the larger behavioural deficits in the P1 group. Analysis of Golgi-Cox stained neurons showed that relative to control groups, all lesion groups showed an increase in dendritic length in the basilar dendrites of layer III pyramidal cells and, paradoxically a decrease in length of the apical dendrites of the same cells. CONCLUSIONS: The bilateral alterations in dendritic organization following the motor cortex lesions suggest that there has been a bilateral reor-ganization of intrinsic cortical connectivity following motor cortex lesions at any age. These alterations in connectivity are likely not identical in the young and adult animals, however, because relative to controls, both the young operated groups, but not the adult group, showed a bilat-eral drop in spine density in the basilar dendrites of layer V pyramidal cells. These findings are discussed with respect to the idea that there may be critical ages in development in which animals can use anatomical modifications to compensate for deficits produced by cortical injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRestorative Neurology and NeuroscienceSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207