MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W171643772 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a440-c

Second‐to‐second control of the pressure‐natriuresis mechanism following pharmacological removal of the renin‐angiotensin system (RAS)

2007· article· en· W171643772 on OpenAlexafffund
Marina Komolova, Michael A. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLosartanNatriuresisRenin–angiotensin systemAngiotensin II receptor type 1Angiotensin IIChemistryEndocrinologyHydrostatic pressureInternal medicineExcretionKidneyBlood pressureMedicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kidney is a key controller of the long‐term level of arterial pressure (AP), in particular, via pressure‐natriuresis (PN). Increases in renal AP (RAP) directly result in a downstream rise of renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure (RIHP) that is linked to elevated Na + excretion. Though many studies have examined mechanisms and modulators involved in regulating the long‐term control of PN, few have characterized its second‐to‐second control. Thus, the aim was to characterize the acute component of the PN mechanism in vivo before and after pharmacological removal of the RAS. Wistar rats (355 ± 4.4g) were anesthetized (ketamine + thiobutabarbital), and RIHP was determined over a range of RAP using occluder cuffs. The response time for RIHP after a change in RAP was <2 sec. The two treatment groups were: Group 1 ‐ no treatment (n=16) and Group 2 ‐ acute AT 1 R blocker (losartan) treatment (LOS; 10mg/kg/hr iv; n=7). In addition, angiotensin II (Ang II; 250ng/kg) was infused before and after LOS. The RAP‐RIHP relationship was found to be linear over a range of AP (slope = 0.07±0.005). While acute AT 1 blockade lowered RAP (↓30%), surprisingly, the characteristics of the RAP‐RIHP relationship (i.e. slope) were not different from controls. In conclusion, despite causing a depressor response, pharmacological inhibition of the RAS did not alter second‐to‐second control of the RAP‐RIHP relationship. (Funded by CIHR; MK by NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207