MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1717075480 · doi:10.15210/interfaces.v2i1.6377

ENTRE MOSLEY, WHITTAKER E PLÍNIO SALGADO: INTERFACES ENTRE O MUNDO FASCISTA DO BRASIL E DO UNIVERSO ANGLO-SAXÃO.

2012· article· pt· W1717075480 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
João Fábio Bertonha

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual de CampinasUppsala UniversitetUniversity of TorontoJames Cook UniversityMassey University
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo do presente artigo é discutir as razões da incapacidade dos movimentos fascistas dos países de língua inglesa, ou seja, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Austrália, África do Sul, Nova Zelândia e Inglaterra, em se tornarem movimentos de massa e se converterem em candidatos reais à conquista do poder durante a década de 30. A idéia central é recusar a idéia de que as tradições liberais desses países os vacinaram automaticamente contra o fascismo e discutir determinações outras que possam explicar a debilidade da direita radical nesses locais. Nesse ponto, é feita uma ponte com um país pertencente a um universo cultural e político completamente diverso, mas onde o fascismo também fracassou, o Brasil, de forma a fazer um exercício de história comparativa e levantar alguns elementos mais gerais sobre a história dos fascismos no mundo ocidental entre as duas guerras mundiais.Résumé: Le but du présent article est de discuter les raisons de l’incapacité des mouvements fascistes des pays de langue anglaise, tels que les États Unis, le Canada, l’Australie, l’Afrique du Sud, la Nouvelle Zélande et l’Angleterre, de se transformer en mouvements de masse et de se convertir en candidats réels à la conquête du pouvoir durant les années 30. L’argument principal sera de refuser l’idée selon laquelle les traditions libérales de ces pays font en sorte qu’ils soient automatiquement vaccinés contre te fascisme. Nous discuterons également des autres déterminations pouvant expliquer la débilité de la droite radicale dans ces pays. Nous tenterons d’établir un lien avec le Brésil, qui appartient à un univers culturel et politique complétement différent, mais dans lequel le fascisme n’a pas réussi à s’implanter non plus. Ceci dans de but de faire un exercice d’histoire comparative en soulevant quelques éléments plus génériques sur l’histoire du fascisme dans le monde occidental durant la période d’entre les deux guerres mondiales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207