MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1717702266 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.2322

Angiosarcoma of the adrenal gland with concurrent contralateral advanced renal cell carcinoma: A diagnostic and management dilemma

2015· article· en· W1717702266 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kaela Gusenbauer, Vladimir Ruzhynsky, Ipshita Kak, Anthony Adili, Kyle Giedraitis, Snežana Popović, Anil Kapoor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiosarcomaMedicinePathologyRenal cell carcinomaHemangiosarcomaAdrenal glandRenal veinNeoplasmKidneyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiosarcoma is a rare high-grade malignant neoplasm with poor clinical outcome and survival rates, occurring most commonly in the skin and soft tissue. It is composed of neoplastic cells that demonstrate endothelial differentiation. The diagnosis of angiosarcoma can be difficult due to its pathohistologic presentation as a poorly differentiated neoplasm with associated secondary changes. We report a case of angiosarcoma of the adrenal gland with concurrent contralateral renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and renal vein thrombus. The presumptive clinical diagnosis was metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the contralateral adrenal gland. Pathohistologic evaluation demonstrated massive hematoma associated with intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH)-like features. We discuss the pathohistological features used to ascertain a diagnosis of angiosarcoma in the presence of IPEH-like changes and differentiate it from reactive vascular proliferation seen in IPEH (Masson's tumour).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicVascular Tumors and AngiosarcomasFrench-language works237,207