MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1719121800 · doi:10.3917/nras.070.0051

Inclusion scolaire et transformation des dispositifs de scolarisation des élèves à besoins spécifiques

2015· article· fr· W1719121800 on OpenAlex
Philippe Tremblay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLa nouvelle revue - Éducation et société inclusives · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceInclusion (mineral)SociologyArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’inclusion scolaire est souvent définie comme une philosophie et un ensemble de pratiques pédagogiques permettant à tous les élèves d’apprendre et de pleinement participer à la vie de l’école. L’inclusion scolaire supposerait donc un changement paradigmatique, par le transfert à l’école ordinaire des besoins particuliers de l’élève. Dans le cadre de cet article, nous traiterons ainsi des implications relatives à l’émergence de l’inclusion scolaire sur les dispositifs de scolarisation des élèves à besoins spécifiques. Nous procéderons à une analyse des transformations induites par l’inclusion scolaire au niveau des six composantes d’un dispositif : (1) les objectifs et finalités, (2) la population, (3) les ressources, (4) les actions prévues et entreprises, (5) les effets et (6) l’environnement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it