Bibliographic record
Abstract
ANTI - Contemporary Art Festival is an international contemporary arts festival presenting site-specific works made for public space. ANTI Festival presents live, sonic, visual and text-based art from today’s most exciting and innovative artists in the Finnish town of Kuopio. Free of charge or audiences ANTI Festival is a meeting place for artists and audiences fascinated by how art shapes and responds to the places and spaces of everyday life. ANTI Festival began in 2002, with Gregg Whelan joining Johanna Tuukkanen as Co-Artistic Director in 2007. The ANTI Festival International Prize for Live Art was launched in 2014. Supported by the Saastamoinen Foundation the prize, of 30,000 EURO was awarded to Canadian artist Heather Cassils. Announcing the winning artist chair of the jury, Ruth Mackenzie said ‘This artist creates profoundly impactful imagery… Michelangelo and all who followed would be rightly awed, as we the jury were, by this artists’ ability to present the human body as art’. Across 2007 – 2013 Whelan and Tuukkanen have commissioned over 120 artists and presented seven conferences with contributions from leading international artists and academics. In 2010 to celebrate a decade of festivals ANTI published ANTIVERSARY - Performance, Live Art and Site-Specificity a collection of articles by international academics, artists and writers detailing the festival’s history and impact on the practice and study of site-specific performance making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".