The primacy of the bishop of Rome: A canonical reflection in response to Ut unum sint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La primaute de Pierre devait servir a l'unite de l'Eglise. En fait, cela n'a pas toujours ete le cas et, en 1995, par la voix de Jean-Paul II, l'Eglise assuma sa part de responsabilites et invita toutes les Eglises-soeurs a un renouveau dans l'oecumenisme. L'A., en tant que canoniste, veut offrir sa contribution a cet effort. Dans un premier temps, pour lui, il faut voir comment la Tradition catholique a compris et exerce cette primaute papale : partant des ecrits de Clement de Rome, il poursuit sa recherche de textes importants jusqu'a l'epoque moderne, s'attardant beaucoup plus, d'abord, a Vatican II qui a mis en valeur une conception de l'Eglise qui respecte mieux l'importance et la dignite des Eglises locales, et ensuite, sur les cc. 330-331 qui nous montrent que ce pouvoir divin de la primaute, tout en etant supreme, plein, immediat et universel, ne signifie pas l'asservissement des Eglises particulieres, car ce pouvoir du Pape n'est ni absolu ni arbitraire, mais au service de l'unite du Corps tout entier. Dans une deuxieme partie, l'A. expose les points de vue des Eglises orthodoxes, lutheriennes et anglicanes, pour conclure qu'il n'y a pas d'opposition reelle entre episcopat et primaute, car cette derniere est un corollaire necessaire de l'unite universelle de toutes les Eglises chretiennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".