MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1722699910 · doi:10.25011/cim.v34i4.15366

Quantification of plasma hTERT DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction

2011· article· en· W1722699910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ying-Jun Yang, Hui Chen, Ping Huang, Chenghua Li, Yu‐Lei Hou

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomerase reverse transcriptaseHepatocellular carcinomaPolymerase chain reactionMalignancyMedicineReal-time polymerase chain reactionHepatitis B virusReverse transcriptaseMolecular biologyTelomeraseCancerGastroenterologyInternal medicinePathologyChemistryVirologyBiologyVirusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To investigate the levels of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) DNA in the plasma of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to evaluate the diagnostic value and correlation of hTERT DNA with clinical parameters in HCC. METHODS: A real-time quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR) system was designed and evaluated. Plasma samples were collected from 60 HCC patients, 21 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and 29 healthy controls. Plasma DNA was extracted and quantified by FQ-PCR. The diagnostic value of plasma hTERT DNA levels and their relationships with clinical characteristics were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Plasma levels of hTERT DNA in HCC patients were significantly higher than in HBV patients (4.18×104±4.94×104 copies/μl vs 1.21×104±6.63×103 copies/μl, P=0.003) and healthy controls (4.18×104±4.94×104 copies/μl vs 1.44×104±6.61×103 copies/μl, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 90% for the ability of hTERT DNA levels to detect malignancy at a cutoff value of 1.87×104 copies/μl. Association analysis revealed that plasma hTERT DNA levels were closely related to tumor size, portal vein cancer embolus and TNM stage (P=0.013, P=0.010, and P=0.029, respectively), but were not associated with lymph node metastasis, hepatitis B surface antigen, or α-fetoprotein (AFP) (all P > 0.05). The levels of plasma hTERT DNA in HCC patients with AFP ≤20 ng/ml were significantly higher than in HBV patients (4.59×104±4.98×104 copies/μl vs 1.44×104±6.63×103 copies/μl, P=0.016) and in healthy controls (4.59×104±4.98×104 copies/μl vs 1.21×104±6.63×103 copies/μl, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitation of plasma hTERT DNA by FQ-PCR may provide a novel complementary tool with potential clinical applications for the screening and detection of HCC. Plasma hTERT DNA has the potential to be a broad tumor marker for common cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207