MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1723488423 · doi:10.4135/9781506335520

Work Motivation: History, Theory, Research, and Practice

2012· book· en· W1723488423 on OpenAlexaff
Gary P. Latham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyWork (physics)Applied psychologyEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Comments Preface: Person-Environment Fit 13 Critical Incidents in the Life of a Practitioner/Scientist Part I The 20th Century: Understanding the Past 1900-1925 Experimental Psychology Scientific Management 1925-1950 Attitude Surveys Laboratory Experiments Field Experiments Hawthorne Studies World War II Need Hierarchy Theory 1950 -- 1975 Job Satisfaction and Job Performance Motivation Theory Theory X and Theory Y Theory Driven Empirical Research Job Characteristics Equity Theory Expectancy Theory Behavior Modification Goal Setting Theory 1975 -- 2000 Goal Setting Theory Social Cognitive Theory Self-Regulation Job Characteristics Revisited A Comprehensive Framework: The High Performance Cycle Principles of Organizational Justice 20th Century Controversies Money Performance and Satisfaction Participative Decision Making Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation Seismic Events: Summary and Overview of the 20th Century A Practitioner's Viewpoint Part II The 21st Century Examining the Present: 2000 -- 2004 Needs Socioanalytic Theory Personality Traits: Predictors of Motivation Five Factor Model (FFM) Self-Regulatory/Self-Monitoring Personality Core Self-Evaluations Goal Orientation Self-Determination Theory Summary Values Context Societal Culture Job Characteristics Person-Environment Fit Cognition Goal Setting Theory Contextual Conditions Implementation Intentions and Auto-Motive Goals Feedback Self-Regulation Social Cognitive Theory Outcome Expectancy Self-Efficacy Moral Disengagement Pygmalion Effect Affect/Emotion Principles of Organizational Justice Part III Future Directions and Potential Misdirections Spirituality Boundaryless Psychology Social Psychology Clinical Psychology Life-Span Research Evolutionary Psychology Neuroscience Time Computer Models Teams Levels of Analysis Integration Part IV Epilogue: The Art of Practice

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.642
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations514
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesFrench-language works237,207