Investigating Level of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health Personnel in Larestan regarding Andropause in 2010
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aim: Andropause in men refers to a condition similar to menopause in women which is associated with decreased level of testosterone and Leydig cells. The results of research have shown that there is still low level of awareness and attitudes towards Andropause among health professionals. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the level of knowledge, attitudes and performance of Larestan health care personnel regarding Andropause in 2010.Materials and methods: This study is descriptive analytic. Sampling was done by census method. Data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire for assessing knowledge, attitude and practice of nursing and medical staff regarding Andropause. Using SPSS 16. Descriptive statistics and t-test were used for data analysis. Results: The mean scores of knowledge, attitudes and practice in relation to Andropause among nursing staff were significantly lower in contrast with practitioners. Comparison of the mean scores for knowledge and practice in the two groups was statistically significant difference (P <0.001). But there was not a statistically significant difference the attitude scores (P =0.84).Conclusions: Given the importance of men's health, lack of knowledge, attitude and stated practice about Andropause among members of the health care teams, it seems essential in teaching about it in academic programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it