MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1733682474 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2011v36n4a2513

Communicating in Canada’s Past: Essays in Media History

2012· article· en· W1733682474 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Geneviève A. Bonin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyRhetoricJournalismPoliticsMedia studiesNewspaperSociologyCultural historyHistoryArt historyLawPolitical scienceAnthropologyTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acknowledgments Introduction: Media History as Concept and Practice Gene Allen and Daniel J. Robinson Part I: New Research in Canadian Media History The Catholic Press: A Challenge ot the 'Journalism of Information' Paradigm Dominique Marquis Old Media, New Media and Competition: Canadian Press and the Emergence of Radio News Gene Allan Britishness, the BBC and the Birth of Canadian Public Broadcasting, 1928-1936 Simon J. Potter The Luxury of Moderate Use': Seagram and Moderation Advertising Daniel J. Robinson Evelyn Dick, Soap Star: Newspaper Coverage of the Torso Murder Case Alison Jacques Variety Show as National Identity: CBC Television and Dominion Day Celebrations, 1958-1980 Matthew Hayday Politics? Fear Not!: The Rise of the Average Superhero in the Visual Rhetoric of Bill Davis' 1971 Election Pamphlet James Cairns Part II: Historiography and Media History Whence and Whither: The Historiography of Canadian Broadcasting Mary Vipond Recent Trends in Research on the History of the Press in Quebec: Towads a Cultural History Fernande Roy Encounters with Theory Paul Rutherford

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.014
Science and technology studies0.0360.026
Scholarly communication0.0170.008
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207