MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1737127650 · doi:10.4324/9780203094662

Critical Reflection in Context

2012· book· en· W1737127650 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Fook, Fiona Gardner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)Context (archaeology)Critical reflectionPsychologySociologyGeographyComputer scienceArchaeologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1. Critical Reflection in Context: Contemporary Perspectives and Issues Jan Fook Section 1: Critical Reflection in Professional Practice Chapter 2. Kathleen McLoughlin and Sinead McGilloway Chapter 3. Integrating Spirituality and Critical Reflection: Toward Critical Spirituality Fiona Gardner Chapter 4. Not Beating Around the Bush - Critical Reflection in a Rural Community Health Service Gavan Thomson Chapter 5. Learning Critical Reflection for Professional Practice Helen Hickson Chapter 6. Using Critical Reflection to Research Practice in a Mental Health Setting Fiona Gardner Section 2: Critical Reflection in Supervision and Management Chapter 7. Critical Reflection in Statutory Work Yolande Ferguson Chapter 8. Critical Reflection and Supervision - An Interdisciplinary Experience Fiona Gardner and Eddie Taalman Chapter 9. Thinking Critically About Student Supervision Lynne Allan Chapter 10. Cringe-ical Reflection? Notes on Critical Reflection and Team Supervision in a Statutory Setting Jeffrey Gordon Baker Chapter 11. Learning to Play Hide and Seek with Pink Elephants Belinda Hearne Section 3: Critical Reflection in Research Chapter 12. The Challenges of Using Critical Reflection to Develop Contextually Appropriate Social Work Gurid Aga Askeland Chapter 13. Using Critical Reflection to Research Spirituality in Clinical Practice Janet Allen Chapter 14. Some Methodological and Ethical Tensions in Using Critical Reflection as a Research Methodology Christine Morley Section 4: Critical Reflection in Education Chapter 15. Critical Reflection Training to Social Workers in a Large, Non-Elective University Class Riki Savaya Chapter 16. Critical Reflection: Multiple Applications within Physiotherapy and Medicine Clare Delaney and Deborah Watkin Chapter 17. Critical Reflection in Social Work Education Roslyn Giles and Rosalie Pockett Chapter 18. An On-Line Critical Reflection Dialogue Group Gail Baikie, Carolyn Campbell, Jackie Thornhill and Jodi Butler Conclusion Chapter 19. Implementing Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care Settings Jan Fook

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.061
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.113
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0610.113
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.049
Scholarly communication0.0310.027
Open science0.0060.026
Research integrity0.0120.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207