The Work Experience in a Call Centre: At the Frontier of Commitment and Distance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Principally based on qualitative data, this article aims to show how customer service representatives (CSRs) in a call centre in Montreal are able to find some spaces of autonomy enabling them to be actively committed in the role associated with their work. Results presented suggest that their work activities are articulated around commitment and distance concepts in a dual perspective. In fact, because their work occurs at the frontier of the organization and market, they can mobilize resources in that zone to reappropriate constraints that press on them by applying either an instrumental commitment towards the organization and social distance towards customers or a commitment towards customers and a social distance towards their employer, depending on behaviours of clients online. These strategies generate beneficial temporary effects for them by rehabilitating their subjectivity in a way that protects them from unpleasant clients and by actualizing the will to be socially affirmed in their role of CSR. In sum, this play of commitment and distance leads to an edification of CSRs’ commitment towards their occupation, actualizing the values that stimulate them in their work. Results presented in this article differ from previous studies on call centres because, on one hand, it shows that it is possible for these kinds of workers to develop a professional commitment based on dual articulation of commitment and distance and, on the other hand, it moves away from the empowerment and social domination theoretical perspectives to improve knowledge about duality angle by showing that the reappropriation of constraints by CSRs remains possible, even though their space of autonomy is thin and fragile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".