MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to assess tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary pharmacodynamics of single escalating doses of Z13752A, a novel dual inhibitor of the metalloproteases ACE and NEP, in healthy volunteers

2000· article· en· W1738847488 on OpenAlexaff
Massimo Bani, A. Colantoni, Michel Guillaume, F. Macchi, Gabriella Moroni, Stefano Persiani

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicinePlaceboPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsVolunteerAdverse effectOral administrationSupine positionPharmacologyCmaxInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of a novel dual ACE-NEP inhibitor, Z13752A, after the oral administration of rising single doses in healthy volunteers. This study was also a preliminarily investigation of Z13752A pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK). METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential study, two alternating panels of eight healthy male volunteers each (six subjects receiving the active treatment + two subjects receiving placebo) were treated with increasing oral doses of Z13752A: 10, 50, 200, and 600 mg were given to panel I and 20, 100, 400 and 800 mg were given to panel II. The study was double-blind relative to placebo or active treatment, and was open with respect to the dose levels. The same volunteer received placebo only once. RESULTS: Single oral doses of Z13752A, as high as 800 mg, were well tolerated. Only six mild-to-moderate adverse events mainly headache, were reported and appeared to be of little clinical relevance. After administration of 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg of Z13752A, a nonsignificant fall in diastolic blood pressure was detected, in both the standing and supine position. After single oral doses of Z13752A, ACE inhibition appeared to be significant at all the doses tested, linearly correlated with the dose and was almost complete at doses > or = 100-200 mg. NEP inhibition was indicated by elevation of ANP and cGMP plasma concentrations in almost all subjects. In the 200-800 mg dose range, Z13752A produced a 50-100% increase of plasma cGMP levels and a 50-80% elevation in urinary cGMP concentrations. Detectable plasma levels of Z13752A were found in all the treated subjects. Z13752A was well and rapidly absorbed, with peak concentrations reached approximately 2.5 h after administration. The mean apparent elimination half-life from plasma was approximately 12 h. The pharmacokinetics of Z13752A after single oral doses were characterized by low intersubject variability and appeared to be dose-independent. CONCLUSIONS: Z13752A showed a good single dose tolerability profile at doses up to 800 mg. The pharmacokinetic data indicate that Z13752A administered orally is rapidly absorbed and available to the systemic circulation in humans. The relatively slow clearance indicates that a once-a-day dose regimen could be considered for Z13752A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207