MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W173908518 · doi:10.14264/334848

Authenticity, consumption and popular culture

2000· dissertation· en· W173908518 on OpenAlex
Keith Christopher Hampson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of Queensland · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopular cultureValue (mathematics)Argument (complex analysis)ModernityIdeologyAestheticsPoliticsConsumption (sociology)RomanceSociologyOriginalityEpistemologySocial scienceMedia studiesArtLiteraturePolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissertation addresses the operation of authenticity within contemporary Canadian popular culture. Specifically, it attempts to understand how this Romantic ideal, proffered by the likes of Rousseau and others, fares under post-modern conditions. Three case studies are examined: The Late Show with David Letterman, the musical genre of Gangsta rap, and the I AM Canadian promotional campaign by Molson Breweries.The literature review has two essential functions: to reconsider the effectiveness of using the resistance-incorporation distinction to evaluate the political dimensions of popular culture. Second, to consider the present and emerging conditions in which the ideology of authenticity operates. I pay special attention to those theories that either (a) discount the value of authenticity as a means of evaluating and relating to popular culture, (b) question the possibility of authenticity in post-modern popular culture, or (c) contend that the value of authenticity is no longer relevant to contemporary consumers.It is the argument of this dissertation that post-modern conditions do pose a challenge to the status and operation of this essential value of modernity. However, I argue that these conditions in no way displace the value or social status of ‘the authentic.’Three contemporary forms of authenticity within popular culture are addressed. Seamless authenticity refers to those instances in which the value of the cultural text lies less in its social and political content (its ideas, values, and so forth) than in the coherency of the text. Here, authenticity transcends all other concerns. Seamless culture is celebrated on the basis of its capacity to be ‘exactly what it claims to be’ - a collapse, then, of reality and representation. The second form, authenticity mining, refers to the process by consumer capital of cultivating or ‘mining’ symbols that resonate with the market. To adequately cater to the demands of the contemporary markets, capital is forced to mine culture previously untouched by commercial culture. The third form of authenticity appears as its antithesis. Ironic authenticity establishes a critical stance in relation to the inauthentic, and through this process, provides the consumer with an opportunity to define him or herself as an aware and autonomous figure. All three varieties are considered in terms of their role in expanding the legitimacy of consumption as a way of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it