Mudanças globais: a problemática do ozônio e algumas de suas implicações
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho é uma reflexão sobre questões tratadas no âmbito das mudanças globais referentes ao clima e, mais especificamente, sobre a problemática dos CFC´s e da camada de ozônio e alguns de seus aspectos teóricos e técnicos. São avaliadas as implicações de ordem diversa como as questões políticas e econômicas resultantes das ações de resposta aos problemas atribuídos a sua produção e suas conotações a partir do Protocolo de Montreal e de Viena. É discutido, também, a efetividade destas ações e seus impactos no sistema ambiental, fazendo refletir sobre o papel da ciência e seus enlaces com a economia bem como suas correlações com os índices de radiação, entre outros aspectos, para o oeste da Bahia.
 
 Abstract
 
 GLOBAL CHANGES: THE ZONE ISSUE AND SOME OF IT IMPLICATIONS
 
 This work is a reflection on issues addressed in the context of global changes related to climate, more specifically on the issue of CFC’s and the ozone layer besides some of its theoretical and technical aspects. Implications of different kinds are assessed, such as political and economic issues arising from response actions to the problems attributed to its production and its connotations from the Montreal Protocol and Vienna. It is also discussed the effectiveness of these actions and their impacts on the environment, making a reflection on the role of science and its links with the economy and their correlation with the incidence of radiation, among other aspects to the west of Bahia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".