MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W174017899 · doi:10.1021/je800438p

Solubility and Stability of Nesquehonite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>·3H<sub>2</sub>O) in NaCl, KCl, MgCl<sub>2</sub>, and NH<sub>4</sub>Cl Solutions

2008· article· en· W174017899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityPhase (matter)ChemistrySalt (chemistry)Aqueous solutionAtmospheric temperature rangeThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work reports the stability and solubility of nesquehonite in several salts (NaCl, NH 4 Cl, MgCl 2, and KCl) over the temperature range of (15 to 35) °C. The needle-like nesquehonite used in this work was prepared by the reaction of analytical pure MgCl 2 with Na 2 CO 3 . The concentration investigated for all salts was up to 4 mol·dm −3 NaCl, 3.5 mol·dm −3 NH 4 Cl, 4 mol·dm −3 MgCl 2, and 1.0 mol·dm −3 KCl at ambient temperature. The solubility of nesquehonite in pure water was found to decrease with temperature within the temperature range in which nesquehonite is the stable phase. In NaCl solutions, the solubility of nesquehonite initially increases to a maximum value and then decreases gradually with an increase of the common salt concentration. It was further found that the addition of MgCl 2, NH 4 Cl, or KCl causes the solubility of nesquehonite to increase due apparently to complexation. XRD and SEM examination of the equilibrated solids showed that nesquehonite is stable in pure water up to 50 °C, but its stability region becomes smaller in concentrated brines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it