MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1741320120 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1995.483705

Determination of paper degradation by-products by direct injection on an HPLC column

2002· article· en· W1741320120 on OpenAlexaff
M. Lessard, Claude Lamarre, André Gendron, Morgane Masse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh-performance liquid chromatographyFurfuralChromatographyElutionDegradation (telecommunications)AcetonitrileMaterials scienceSolid phase extractionChemistryCatalysisComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The by-products of the thermal degradation of insulating paper include 2-furfural, 2-acetylfuran and 5-methyl-2-furfural. These furanic compounds are usually isolated by subjecting the insulating oil to a pretreatment stage on a silica solid-phase cartridge, or liquid-liquid extraction (IEC 1198) before analyzing them by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). However, these procedures are time-consuming and not very practical. This paper describes an alternative analytical method, also based on HPLC, but not requiring pretreatment. The insulating oil is injected directly on a PRP-1 column. The furanic by-products are eluted in less than 20 min when a mixture of water and acetonitrile (75:25, v/v) is used as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.5 cm/sup 3//min. The by-products are detected by ultraviolet. In-service transformer oils have been analyzed by the new method and the results compared to those obtained using the IEC method as well as others obtained by a private laboratory. The paper stresses the simplicity and, in particular, the increase in productivity offered by the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207