Low-dose chemotherapy for extra-abdominal desmoid tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of patients with extra-abdominal desmoid tumor treated with low dose chemotherapy (methotrexate and vinblastine) both for tumor response and treatment related toxicity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 12 patients who underwent low dose chemotherapy for extra abdominal desmoid of different locations. The study took place in the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada between 1996 and 2003. We evaluated the patients for their compliance, tumor response, complications of treatment, and impact of treatment on symptoms. There were 7 females and 5 males with a mean age of 46 years. RESULTS: Disease related morbidity included pain in 7 patients, functional limitation in 7 and cosmetic defects in 3. The mean tumor size was 11 cm (3-20 cm). The mean follow-up was 43 months (15-71 months). Chemotherapy was administered weekly. Complications were significant. Only 2 patients did not experience the toxicity. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 6 tumors showed a partial response and 6 remained stable. None showed progression. Of the 7 patients who had painful tumors, 6 achieved significant symptom relief. Function was improved in 3 and restored to normal in 4. Cosmesis was improved in 2 of the 3. At latest follow-up, tumors remained stable in 8, one has markedly regressed and 3 exhibited progression at an average of 54 months. Only one patient required surgery. The only long term side effect was a sensory peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Low dose chemotherapy was found to be a valuable adjunct to prevent local progression and improve symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".