Nature of Self in Arthur Miller's '' A View from the Bridge''
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is an attempt to analyze the nature of Self in one of Miller’s most acclaimed plays, A View from the Bridge . The analysis focuses on the private self and the public self by giving a brief comparison of Miller’s Death of a salesman, The crucible and All my Sons . The study will first have a brief look at the nature of self in Miller’s earlier plays to reach a better understanding of the depth of self in his A view from the Bridge , which is the focal point of this study. Lastly, the paper concludes with suggesting that the only loophole to run away from this tragic duality of self is to accept that any kind of escape from the reality of life is self-destroying, so both the tears of happiness as well as the tears of melancholy should be equally accepted as the inevitable game of this complicated and unpredictable world of indifference; the game, which is the integral part of man’s existence. Key words: Miller; Duality; Private self; Public self Resume Cette etude est une tentative d'analyser la nature de soi dans l'un des jeux les plus acclames de Miller, Une vue du pont. L'analyse se concentre sur le soi prive et le public en donnant de soi une breve comparaison de la mort de Miller d'un vendeur, le creuset et tous mes fils. L'etude sera d'abord un bref regard sur la nature de l'auto dans des pieces anterieures de Miller pour atteindre une meilleure comprehension de la profondeur de l'auto dans sa Une vue du pont, qui est le point focal de cette etude. Enfin, le document se termine par ce qui suggere que l'echappatoire que de s'enfuir de cette dualite tragique de soi est d'accepter que toute sorte d'echapper a la realite de la vie est autodestructeur, donc a la fois des larmes de bonheur ainsi que les larmes de la melancolie devraient etre egalement accepte comme le jeu incontournable de ce monde complique et imprevisible de l'indifference; le jeu, qui est la partie integrante de l'existence de l'homme. Mots-cles: Miller; La dualite; Le prive du soi; Le public du soi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".