Application of the Palladium‐Catalysed Norbornene‐Assisted Catellani Reaction Towards the Total Synthesis of (+)‐Linoxepin and Isolinoxepin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Our ongoing effort towards the development of highly selective transition‐metal‐catalysed C–H activation processes has led to the expansion of the Catellani reaction. In a Pd0/PdII/PdIV‐catalysed domino reaction, an aryl iodide, alkyl iodide and tert‐butyl acrylate were combined to synthesize the carbon framework of the novel lignan (+)‐linoxepin. The enantioselective synthesis highlights the work accomplished in our group and provides an excellent procedure for the reliable and scalable synthesis of architecturally complex scaffolds. This report outlines the synthetic approaches towards this interesting class of biologically active molecules. After the key Catellani/Heck reaction, our synthesis features a Leimeux–Johnson oxidation and a titanium tetrachloride mediated aldol condensation. Finally, a tuneable Mizoroki–Heck reaction was performed to furnish not only the natural product (+)‐linoxepin but also its isoform, which we have named isolinoxepin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".